Provider Selection Regime (PSR)

Details of representations made to the independent patient choice and procurement can be found below, and a reference document outlining information about which issues were considered in each case is also available. The panel welcomes suggestions about what further information would be useful for relevant authorities and providers, and can be contacted by email at england.procurementpanelinfo@nhs.net.

• Case CR0001-24: review of a proposed contract award for online ADHD assessment, diagnostic and management services for North Cumbria
• Case CR0003-24: review into a proposed contract award for a same day urgent care service in Liverpool
• Case CR0004-24: review of a proposed contract award for an all-age continuing healthcare service in Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent
• Case CR0008-24: review of a proposed contract award for drug and alcohol services in Bath and North East Somerset
• Case CR0009-25: review of a proposed contract award for liaison and diversion and RECONNECT services in Lancashire and Cumbria
• Case CR0010-25: review of a proposed contract award for an adult and paediatric orthotics and wheelchair service in Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland
• Case CR0011-25: review of a proposed contract award for a community aural microsuction service in Norfolk and Waveney
• Case CR0013-25: review of a proposed contract award for intermediate minor oral surgery services in Bradford
• Case CR0014-25: review of a proposed contract award for intermediate minor oral surgery services in Yorkshire and Humber
• Case CR0015-25: review of a proposed contract award for targeted lung healthcare checks in Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin
• Case CR0016-25: review of a proposed contract award for non-emergency patient transport services in Humber and North Yorkshire
• Case CR0017-25: review of a proposed contract award for GP out-of-hours services in Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin
• Case CR0018-25: review of a proposed contract award for a primary care partner for urgent treatment centre in Lewisham and Greenwich
• Case CR0020-25: review of a proposed contract award for Whitehawk Alternative Provider Medical Services (APMS) primary care services in Sussex
• Case CR0021-25: review of a proposed contract award for talking therapies and psychological therapies for severe mental health problems in Mid and South Essex
• Case CR0022-25: review of a proposed contract award for talking therapies and psychological therapies for severe mental health problems in mid and South Essex
• Case CR0023-25: review of a proposed contract award for community audiology in Barnet
• Case CR0024-25: review of a proposed contract award for community audiology in Barnet
• Case CR0026-25: case acceptance decision in relation to a proposed contract award for mental health support services in West Sussex
• Case CR0027-25: case acceptance decision in relation to a proposed contract award for intermediate oral surgery services in Bradford and Bradford North
• Case CR0029-25: review of a proposed contract award for mandatory dental services in Oxfordshire
• Case CR0031-25: review of a proposed contract award for insourced services in Leicester
• Case CR0032-25: review of a proposed contract award for a community dermatology service in Greater Manchester
• Case CR0033-25: review of a proposed contract award for a planned outpatients non-emergency patient transport service in Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire
• Case CR0034-25: review of a proposed contract award for a planned outpatients non-emergency patient transport service in Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire
• Case CR0037-25: review of a proposed contract award for an integrated podiatry service in South Tyneside and Sunderland
• Case CR0045-26: review of a proposed cross sectional post mortem imaging service in Rochdale, Oldham and Bury
• Case CR0046-26: review of a proposed contract award for an urgent treatment centre in Hampshire
• Case CR0048-26: review of a proposed contract award for integrated urgent care service in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough

The panel does not routinely publish the details of complaints that have been received but which have not been accepted for review. As case numbers are assigned when the panel receives a complaint, rather than when it has been accepted, there are discontinuities in the numbering of accepted cases.