Provider Selection Regime (PSR)

Details of representations made to the independent patient choice and procurement panel:

• Case CR0001-24: review of a proposed contract award for online ADHD assessment, diagnostic and management services for North Cumbria
• Case CR0003-24: review into a proposed contract award for a same day urgent care service in Liverpool
• Case CR0004-24: review of a proposed contract award for an all-age continuing healthcare service in Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent
• Case CR0008-24: review of a proposed contract award for drug and alcohol services in Bath and North East Somerset
• Case CR0009-25: review of a proposed contract award for liaison and diversion and RECONNECT services in Lancashire and Cumbria
• Case CR0010-25: review of a proposed contract award for an adult and paediatric orthotics and wheelchair service in Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland
• Case CR0011-25: review of a proposed contract award for a community aural microsuction service in Norfolk and Waveney
• Case CR0013-25: review of a proposed contract award for intermediate minor oral surgery services in Bradford
• Case CR0014-25: review of a proposed contract award for intermediate minor oral surgery services in Yorkshire and Humber
• Case CR0015-25: review of a proposed contract award for targeted lung healthcare checks in Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin
• Case CR0016-25: review of a proposed contract award for non-emergency patient transport services in North Yorkshire and Humber
• Case CR0017-25: review of a proposed contract award for GP out-of-hours services in Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin
• Case CR0018-25: review of a proposed contract award for a primary care partner for urgent treatment centre in Lewisham and Greenwich.

The panel does not routinely publish the details of complaints that have been received but which have not been accepted for review. To date, complaints that have not been accepted for review have typically been those that have been submitted before the relevant authority has had the opportunity to complete its internal review. As case numbers are assigned when the panel receives a complaint, rather than when it has been accepted, there are discontinuities in the numbering of accepted cases.