Scope of this report
Topic | Covered by this report? | If ‘no’, where you can find information about this part of the pathway |
---|---|---|
Underpinning functions | ||
Uptake and coverage | Yes | Not applicable |
Workforce | Yes | Not applicable |
IT and equipment | Yes | Not applicable |
Commissioning | Partly | NHS England London Public Health Commissioning Team |
Leadership and governance | Yes | Not applicable |
Pathway | ||
Cohort identification | Yes | Not applicable |
Invitation and information | Yes | Not applicable |
Testing | Yes | Not applicable |
Results and referral | Yes | Not applicable |
Diagnosis | Yes | Not applicable |
Intervention / treatment | Yes | Not applicable |
Summary
Bowel cancer screening aims to reduce mortality and the incidence of bowel cancer both by detecting cancers and removing polyps, which, if left untreated, may develop into cancer.
The findings in this report relate to the quality assurance visit on Thursday 17 November 2022 to Barking, Havering and Redbridge bowel cancer screening service which is commissioned by London NHS England Public Health Commissioning team. Any commissioning findings are outside the scope of this report and will be followed up directly with the commissioner.
Quality assurance purpose and approach
Quality assurance (QA) aims to achieve and maintain national standards and promote continuous improvement in bowel cancer screening. This is to ensure all eligible people have access to a consistent high-quality service wherever they live.
QA visits are carried out by the NHS England Screening Quality Assurance Service (SQAS).
The evidence for this report comes from the following sources:
- Monitoring of routine data collected by the NHS England
- data and reports from external organisations
- evidence submitted by the provider
- information collected during pre-review visits to Barking Havering and Redbridge bowel cancer screening service on 12 October 2022
- information shared with the London SQAS as part of the visit process.
The screening service
Barking Havering and Redbridge bowel cancer screening programme (BHR BCSP) is provided by Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust (BHRUT). The screening service was formed from North East London Bowel Cancer Screening Centre from which it became independent in 2015.
London was one of the first regions to be impacted by COVID undergoing several lockdowns from March 2020. This resulted in bowel cancer screening services in London being paused at the end of March 2020. London screening services restarted in late April/early May 2020 following a series of restoration meetings. BHR BCSC has been able to recover by achieving invitation rates of up to two hundred and two percent of the former invitation rate and was fully recovered along with most screening services in London by September 2020.
Programme management, administration, specialist screening practitioner (SSP) assessments, diagnostic tests (colonoscopies and computed tomography colonoscopies (CTCs)) and pathology are undertaken at Queen’s Hospital with additional colonoscopies offered at King George’s Hospital (KGH) which is part of the same Trust. Both endoscopy sites (Queens and KGH) are JAG accredited.
Bowel scope screening was decommissioned from January 2021. BHR BCSP started its four-year age extension roll out plan inviting fifty-six-year-olds from July 2021 and fifty-eight-year-olds from May 2022. It is expected that all bowel cancer screening services across the country will fully age extend to fifty-year-olds by 2024. Discussions are shortly going to take place between NHS England (London) and NHS England (Essex) teams around the future bowel cancer screening arrangements for the Epping Forest population and the possibility of transferring to the BHR BCSP. From April 2023 lynch syndrome screening surveillance will be introduced into the programme.
Findings
The screening service was able to recover quickly clearing the backlog and maintaining the screening service despite all the challenges. This was due to a high level of staff dedication and team work.
A substantive Director of Bowel Cancer Screening was appointed in November 2021 with clear reporting lines in the governance structure to escalate risk and incidents. There is also a clinical programme manager who is supported by a lead specialist screening practitioner. The screening service has not got in place various deputies including a deputy director of screening, deputy programme manager and deputy lead specialist screening practitioner.
The screening service is well led with effective communication between team members.
The screening service has managed to recruit and accredit two further substantive colonoscopists and could further increase resilience by recruiting more substantive colonoscopists to reduce the reliance on locum staff.
The screening service still relies on a lone radiologist and pathology is also under resourced. This poses a risk to the screening service particularly as the screening service expands with new programme developments including age extension, the potential transfer of Epping Forest population and the increase in surveillance cases from lynch syndrome screening in April 2023.
Diagnostic test uptake is low across London but Barking, Havering and Redbridge bowel cancer screening programme (BHR BCSP) is one of two screening services that has the highest diagnostic test uptake in London averaging 78.06%. The dedication of the specialist screening practitioners (SSP) and their interaction with patients at the SSP assessment will have contributed to this high diagnostic test uptake rate.
BHR BCSP also meets all other KPIs: caecal intubation with photographic evidence, Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR), and polyp retrieval rates.
There is a new health promotion specialist in post with a good health promotion plan in place working with various organisations such as community links, integrated care boards, cancer alliances and councils for voluntary and primary care.
Immediate concerns
The QA visit team identified no immediate concerns.
Urgent recommendations
The QA visit team identified 3 urgent recommendations. A letter was sent to the Director of Screening and programme manager on 19 November asking that the following item(s) are addressed:
- Urgent Recommendation No 01 – Make sure there is appropriate resource and funding available for pathology to enable the screening service to fully age extend, allowing bowel cancer screening programme pathologists to manage the increase in workload and maintain a high level of service for the bowel cancer screening programme.
- Urgent Recommendation No 02 – Establish an alternative pathway for screening positive patients who are deemed unfit for either colonoscopy or computed tomography colonoscopy (CTC) to be managed outside of the screening programme. Minimal preparation CT without carbon dioxide insufflation cannot be performed as the only radiological test accepted within the bowel cancer screening programme is a full CT colonography.
- Urgent Recommendation No 03 – Make sure that all patient identifiable data is transferred between screening sites in line with information governance regulations using a hospital courier or electronic transfer. Standard operating procedures to be updated with staff being made aware of the new process and reminding them of the importance in adhering to information governance regulations.
- A response including an action plan was received informing the visiting QA of the steps taken to partially resolve the urgent recommendation(s).
Examples of practice that can be shared
The QA visit team identified several areas of practice for sharing, including:
- production of a detailed annual report
- daily task allocation for the administration team
- computed tomography colonography (CTC) radiographers participating in the Health Education England (HEE) pan London CTC training initiative
- use and updating of a daily patient tracking list (PTL)
- Good health promotion plan and activities to improve uptake
Recommendations
The following recommendations are for the provider to action unless otherwise stated.
No. | Recommendation | Reference | Timescale | Priority | Evidence required | ||
URGENT RECOMMENDATIONS | |||||||
Urgent 01 | Make sure that there is appropriate resource and funding available for pathology to enable the screening service to fully age extend, allowing BCSP pathologists to manage the increase in workload and maintain a high level of service for the bowel cancer screening programme. | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 1 month | Urgent | Confirmation that pathology has sufficient staffing and resource to meet current and future programme developments as outlined within the updated capacity and demand plan | ||
Urgent 02 | Establish an alternative pathway for screening positive patients who are deemed unfit for either colonoscopy or computed tomography colonoscopy (CTC) to be managed outside of the screening programme. | Bowel cancer screening programme: guidelines for CTC imaging | 1 month | Urgent | Updated standard operating procedure Minimal preparation CT without carbon dioxide insufflation cannot be performed as the only radiological test accepted within the bowel cancer screening programme is a full CT colonography. | ||
Urgent 03 | Make sure that all patient identifiable data is transferred between screening sites in line with information governance regulations using a hospital courier or electronic transfer. | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 1 month | Urgent | Confirmation of action Confirmation of staff training on the update processUpdated standard operating procedure reflecting the transfer of PID between screening sites | ||
Service provider and population served | |||||||
No recommendations were made in this section | |||||||
Governance and leadership | |||||||
04 | Make sure there is sufficient programmed activity for the Director of Screening/ Lead Colonoscopist to undertake both roles. | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 3 months | High | Written confirmation | ||
05 | Appoint deputies to director of screening lead colonoscopist, clinical programme manager and lead specialist screening practitioner (SSP) to maintain consistency and sustainability of the programme taking account of fluctuations in demand. | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 6 months | High | Job descriptions/job plans for deputy roles for Director of Screening/Lead colonoscopist, programme manager and lead SSPUpdated organisation structure | ||
06 | Ensure attendance by specialist screening practitioners to the quarterly screening centre governance meetings fulfilling expected attendance as outlined in the terms of reference. | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 3 months | Standard | Updated terms of reference and confirmation of attendance |
No. | Recommendation | Reference | Timescale | Priority | Evidence required |
07 | Director of Screening to strengthen oversight of the whole screening pathway including radiology and pathology by making sure that all BCSP staffing including pathology and radiology take part in meetings and continued professional development activities so that they maintain competency and are up to date with BCSP developments. | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 3 months | High | Confirm the process including meetings through which oversight is achieved |
08 | Support to be identified for the Clinical Programme Manager to produce a demand and capacity plan in preparation for future programme developments. | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 3 months | High | Confirmation that the capacity and demand plan has been updated |
09 | Continue to implement the current excellent health improvement plan, evaluating its success in improving uptake and sharing learning and outcome with commissioners. | PHE Screening inequalities strategy | 12 months | Standard | Share learning and outcome from the health improvement plan at future commissioning programme boards/ SQAS regional education days |
10 | Establish an annual audit schedule covering all professional areas involved in the BCSP and arrangements to share and implement the learning from audits at team meetings. . | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 3 months | High | Audit schedule, lead for each audit and minutes of the meeting where it was ratified/evidence of actions taken. Audit schedule should include (but not limited to): Programme Management: Attendance audit for all BCSP meetingsProgramme Management: OBIEE audit in line with national guidanceSSP: Do not attend SSP assessment auditPathology: Compliance with RCPath MDS by individual pathologists (at least 50 cases per pathology)Pathology: An audit on sessile serrated lesions reported by individual pathologist to establish diagnostic criteria.Radiology: Reporting times from request to diagnostic test and from diagnostic test to reportingRadiology: post imaging colorectal cancer (PICRC) review of interval cancers |
11 | Develop an improved full audit process template for future audits and provide training on audit for screening staff. | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 3 months | High | Confirm full audit cycle process in place and training provided |
12 | Strengthen and improve the quality management system (QMS) by undertaking a gap analysis and make sure that all standard operating procedures (SOPs) and work instructions (Wis) contain a version control table, process for how these are updated and for SOPs/Wis to be reviewed on an annual basis. | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 3 months | Standard | Update QMS list following a gap analysis ensuring that the following SOP and WIs are in place and updated on an annual basis: SOP for maintaining version controlRight Results SOP to include right results pathway Induction WI for nursing and administration teams |
13 | Include information on any previous computed tomography colonography undertaken in the information supplied to the specialist screening practitioners along with previous colonoscopies. | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 3 months | Standard | Confirmation that information on all previous diagnostic tests is included |
Infrastructure | |||||
14 | Develop and implement a workforce plan and structure to meet existing and future needs for age extension, introduction of lynch screening and any additional workload resulting from the possible transfer of Epping Forest population. | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 3 months | High | Workforce plan to meet activity demands and monitoring arrangements. This should include: recruitment of substantive colonoscopist to reduce the reliance on locum staff and provide stability to the screening servicean additional reporting radiologist to support the lead radiologist and provide more resilience to the programme additional pathologists required (as per urgent recommendation no 1) |
15 | Ensure that all BCSP reporting pathologists and radiologists can demonstrate attendance to BCSP educational/training events | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 12 months | Standard | Confirmation that all pathologists and radiologists attend educational events held in 2023 as part of their professional development. Establish a process for logging attendance and follow up of non-attenders |
16 | Ensure there is sufficient office space to accommodate additional SSP staff appointed for age extension | Joint advisory group on GI Endoscopy | 12 months | Standard | Confirmation that sufficient SSP office space has been identified |
17 | Specialist screening practitioners to enter date from clinic live onto BCSS with paper clinic proforma only to be used as failsafe for any IT issues/problems. | Guidance on Completion of BCSS Datasets April 2012 | Immediately | High | Confirmation and updated standard operating procedure |
18 | Ensure there is sufficient IT connection to enable pathologists to participate in the forthcoming national EQA scheme | Joint advisory group on GI Endoscopy | 3 months | High | Confirmation that adequate IT systems and connection are in place. |
Pre-diagnostic assessment | |||||
19 | Implement text messaging reminders for appointments to help improve uptake and reduce do not attends (DNA) | PHE Screening inequalities strategy | 6 months | Standard | Confirmation and updated standard operating procedure |
Diagnosis | |||||
20 | Ensure that polyp MDT meetings are being attended by all colonoscopists and a pathologist and invitations are issued to the SSPs | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 3 months | Standard | Confirmation that the following are invited and attend the complex polyp multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting: All colonoscopists (or are represented) to present and discuss complex polyps identified on their screening listsBCSP reporting pathologist to ensure quoracy Specialist Screening Practitioners (SSPs) for their learning and development |
21 | Ensure all colonoscopists meet the national standard for the minimum number of 120 colonoscopies per year | Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 | 3 months | Standard | Evidence of standards being met from BCSS and from the clinic rota |
22 | Establish a process to identify BCSP cases when using the incoming electronic requesting system | Bowel cancer screening programme: guidelines for CTC imaging | 12 months | Standard | Confirmation that the electronic system can flag BCSP cases |
23 | Ensure SSPs are familiar with the computed tomography colonography (CTC) as procedure and attend a CTC case as part of induction | Bowel cancer screening programme: guidelines for CTC imaging | 6 months | Standard | Confirmation that all SSPs are familiar with the CTC procedure and attendance to a CTC case is included within SSP induction plans |
24 | SSPs to attend endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures entering the procedure data live on BCSS | Bowel cancer screening: specialist screening practitioner | 3 months | Standard | Confirmation that SSPs are attending and entering data live on the BCSS |
Next steps
The screening is responsible for developing an action plan in collaboration with the commissioners to complete the recommendations contained within this report.
SQAS will work with commissioners to monitor activity and progress of the recommendations for 12 months after the report is published. After this point SQAS will send a letter to the provider and commissioners summarising progress made and will outline any further action(s) needed.
Appendix A: References
- Bowel cancer screening accreditation Bowel cancer screening accreditation
- Bowel cancer screening programme: guidelines for CTC imaging Bowel cancer screening imaging use
- Bowel cancer screening programme: standards Bowel cancer screening programme standards
- Bowel cancer screening: guidelines for colonoscopy Bowel cancer screening colonoscopy quality assurance
- Bowel cancer screening: helping people with learning disabilities Bowel cancer screening helping people with learning disabilities
- Bowel cancer screening: managing incidents Bowel cancer screening managing incidents
- Bowel cancer screening: pathology guidance on reporting lesions Bowel cancer screening reporting lesions
- Bowel cancer screening: programme overview Bowel cancer screening programme overview
- Bowel cancer screening: programme specific operating model Bowel cancer screening programme specific operating model
- Bowel cancer screening: specialist screening practitioner Bowel cancer screening specialist screening practitioner
- Cancer screening: informed consent Cancer screening informed consent
- Joint advisory group on GI Endoscopy The JAG
- Key Performance Indicators NHS screening programmes Antenatal, newborn, young person and adult NHS population screening: reporting data definitions
- Managing Safety Incidents in NHS Screening Programmes Managing safety incidents in NHS screening programmes
- NHS BCSP Quality Assurance arrangements for the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme, Draft version 2.1 (December 2010)
- NHS England Serious Incident Framework – Supporting learning to prevent recurrence (March 2015) Serious incident framework
- NHS population screening: pathway requirements specifications Bowel cancer screening pathway requirements specifications
- PHE Screening inequalities strategy PHE Screening inequalities strategy
- Public health profiles Public health profiles
- Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 BCSP Schedules 2022-23 – NHS Public Health Commissioning & Operations – Future NHS Collaboration Platform