Screening Quality Assurance visit report – Humber and Yorkshire Coast Bowel Cancer Screening Service

NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme
21 March 2023

Scope of this report

Covered by this report?If ‘no’, where you can find information about this part of the pathway
Underpinning functions
Uptake and coverageYesNot applicable
WorkforceYesNot applicable
IT and equipmentYesNot applicable
CommissioningYesPartly
Leadership and governanceYesNot applicable
Pathway
Cohort identificationNoBowel cancer screening hub
Invitation and informationNoBowel cancer screening hub
TestingNoBowel cancer screening hub
Results and referralNoBowel cancer screening hub
DiagnosisYesNot applicable
Intervention / treatmentYesNot applicable

Summary

Bowel cancer screening aims to reduce mortality and the incidence of bowel cancer both by detecting cancers and removing polyps, which, if left untreated, may develop into cancer.

The findings in this report relate to the quality assurance visit on 20 and 21 March 2023 to Humber and Yorkshire Coast Bowel Cancer Screening Service which is commissioned by NHS England Yorkshire and Humber Public Health Programmes Team (PHPT). Any commissioning findings are outside the scope of this report and will be followed up directly with the commissioner.

Quality assurance purpose and approach

Quality assurance (QA) aims to achieve and maintain national standards, promote continuous improvement in bowel cancer screening and support reducing health inequalities. This is to ensure all eligible people have access to a consistent high quality, effective, equitable and safe service wherever they live.

QA visits are carried out by the NHS England Screening Quality Assurance Service (SQAS).

The evidence for this report comes from the following sources:

  • monitoring of routine data collected by the NHS England
  • data and reports from external organisations
  • evidence submitted by the provider(s) and external organisations
  • discussion with the commissioner in advance of the visit
  • information shared with the North East Yorkshire and Humber SQAS as part of the visit process

The screening service

Humber and Yorkshire Coast (HYC) screening service provides bowel cancer screening for an eligible population of approximately 246,151 and a registered population of 1,153, 839 across the geography. The Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) covered by the centre are Lincolnshire ICB and Humber & North Yorkshire ICB.

The screening service started inviting men and women aged 60 to 69 for faecal occult blood test (FoBT) screening in February 2007. In 2010 the service age extended the range covered to include 70- to 74-year-olds. Bowel scope screening began in 2017 inviting men and women aged 55. Bowel scope had been partly rolled out; however this service was nationally decommissioned in April 2021. In June 2019, the new faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening was introduced. In March 2022 the centre age extended to include 56-year-olds and in August 2022 to include 58-year-olds.

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (HUTH) are the host Trust. North Lincolnshire & Goole NHS Foundation Trust (NLAG), and York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (YSTH) are the associated Trusts involved in service delivery.

Service co-ordination and administration takes place at Castle Hill Hospital (CHH), with a second administration site at Diana Princess of Wales Hospital (DPOW). The following table identifies the hospital sites involved in providing the HYC screening service.

Trust/siteAdminSSPColonoscopyRadiologyPathology
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Castle Hill HospitalYesTelephone & virtual appts, F2F if required.YesYesNo
Hull Royal InfirmaryNoTelephone & virtual appts, F2F if required.YesYes Yes
York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHSFT
Scarborough HospitalNo activity at presentNo activity at presentNoNoNo
North Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Trust
Scunthorpe General HospitalYesNoYesYesNo
Diana Princess of WalesNoNoYesYesNo
** Scunthorpe and DPOW pathology is undertaken by Pathlinks, Lincoln Hospital

Specialist screening practitioner (SSP) clinics were held at a number health centre and hospital sites. This provision stopped when the bowel cancer screening programme (BCSP) was paused as a result of Covid-19. All SSP assessments are currently carried out via telephone or tele-conferencing with face-to-face appointments available if required.

The screening programme hub based in Gateshead undertakes:

  • the invitation (call and recall) of individuals’ eligible for FIT screening,
  • the testing of screening samples, and
  • onward referral of individuals needing further assessment.

This element of the pathway is outside the scope of this QA visit.

Findings

The service showed great resilience through the Covid-19 pandemic and managed to restore the service despite the Humber region being significantly impacted by high infection rates and local lockdowns. The Clinical Director (CD) is committed to the delivery of the BCSP and is well supported by an experienced and established leadership team.

The visiting team recognised many areas of improvement since the last QA visit in 2016, and the screening team should be commended for their hard work in developing the service.

The HYC BCSP leadership team have a good working relationship with the host Trust management colleagues and are in regular communication with the associated Trust management teams. This has been integral to the service successfully age extending to 56- and 58-year-olds.

At present, the programme does not have sufficient screening colonoscopists to provide a robust service and this is evident in the service’s below standard diagnostic waits. A workforce strategy for increasing the number of screeners needs to be developed to ensure the future of the service. This will require the support of both the host Trust and associated Trusts.

The pathology turnaround times are below standard at HRI due to low numbers of BCSP reporting pathologists. Efforts to engage more pathologists to carry out BCSP work should continue.

Links between the radiology and pathology services with the centre team need strengthening. More regular attendance at relevant BCSP meetings by the lead radiologist and lead pathologist; ensuring there is a lead radiographer contact at each site; and proactive engagement from the centre team will help this.

The team are carrying out excellent work around health promotion and SQAS would encourage this to be evaluated in order to demonstrate and share its effectiveness.

The service has no outstanding recommendations from their previous QA visit in 2016.

Immediate concerns

The QA visit team identified no immediate concerns.

High priority findings

The QA visit team identified 5 high priority findings as summarised below:

  • The Service Level Agreement between HUTH and NLAG remains unsigned. This should be finalised and signed.
  • The Joint Advisory Group (JAG) accreditation has been lost at CHH and HRI. Work should continue to ensure this is regained.
  • To improve diagnostic test waits and to secure the future delivery of the service, the centre and its associate Trusts should develop a strategy for expanding the number of screeners.
  • The Clinical Director (CD) has plans to retire. The centre should develop a workforce strategy, to include succession planning for CD.
  • There were a number of essential audits missing from the radiology evidence submission. These are detailed in the recommendations table. The screening radiology service should ensure these audits are completed.

Examples of practice that can be shared

The QA visit team identified several areas of practice for sharing, including:

  • The service has introduced the role of ‘administrator of the day’. This role ensures that specific duties are allocated to one person which then frees up the rest of the team to manage their workloads.
  • All cancer cases undergo mismatch repair (MMR) or microsatellite instability (MSI) testing in both laboratories.
  • The service have an SSP who leads on the health promotion work. They have a dedicated health promotion group who meet to discuss the planning and evaluation of health promotion activities carried out by the team.
  • The service’s operational meeting is recorded, and the minute taker can refer if needed. This ensures no clinical details are missed.

Recommendations

The following recommendations are for the provider to action unless otherwise stated.

No.RecommendationReferenceTimescalePriorityEvidence required
Service provider and population served
No recommendations made in this section
Governance and leadership
01Finalise, and sign the SLA between HUTH and NLAG.203 monthsHighCopy of signed SLA
02PM to send BCSP performance report to all relevant stakeholders at NLAG.203 monthsStandardConfirmation from Programme Manager
03SSPs and the administration team should audit the reasons why participants fail to go on to have a test after their SSP appointment. This should be done by locality and shared with appropriate stakeholders.3, 206 monthsStandardCopy of audit report and confirmation of distribution
04The centre – with input from the trust and associate trusts – to develop a workforce strategy, to include: succession planning for CDa plan for expanding the number of screenersa robust solution to delivering screening colonoscopy at Scarborough3, 206 monthsHighCopy of strategy
05An annual report for 2022 should be completed and shared with the appropriate stakeholders.203 monthsStandardConfirmation from Programme Manager
06HUTH, NLAG and YSTH should have an up-to-date incident policy referencing safety incidents in screening.146 monthsStandardCopy of policies
07Ensure radiology staff in all trusts are aware of the AVI SOP and that all radiology AVIs are promptly sent to the Lead Radiologist.146 monthsStandardConfirmation from Programme Manager and radiology lead
08The audit and monitoring schedules should be reviewed and updated to include all audits carried out across the pathway.206 monthsStandardCopy of updated schedules
09The following missing evidence from the radiology submission should be produced: all audits specified in the ‘Bowel Cancer Screening: Guidelines for CTC Imaging (Section 15) from NLAG (Dose audit and patient experience survey were received so do not need resubmitting) radiologist CTC workload data over two years from NLAGCTC turnaround times for BCSP patients over one year from HUTH and YSTHthree-year BCSP polyp/cancer identification audit per radiologist from each siteBuscopan and IV contrast PGD from YSTHthe post CTC patient information leaflet from YSTH  26 monthsHighCopy of evidence          
10The pathology services should conduct an audit of colorectal cancer reporting in the next 12 months (at least 50 cases) and compare with Royal College of Pathologists standards.7    12 monthsStandardCopy of audits
11More administrators should complete training on the computer system at DPOW.156 monthsStandardConfirmation training has been completed
12A member of the management team should be on duty each day of the week.153 monthsStandardDuty rota
13The service should ensure that the process for updating SOPs and work instructions is effective.36 monthsStandardSOP review list
Infrastructure
14The centre needs to ensure that all vacant BCSP leadership posts (Lead Colonoscopist and Lead Radiographers) are appointed to and that all leadership roles have the appropriate time in their job plans required to fulfil the role.2, 3, 206 monthsStandardProgramme Manager to confirm appointments and that time is specified in job plans for all lead positions
15The pathology service should ensure any locums used have experience of the BCSP and participate in the BCSP EQA when the scheme restarts. This should be detailed in a SOP.76 monthsStandardSOP and confirmation from the Lead Pathologist
16SSPs should become familiar with the business plan and implement the process should IT systems go down.33 monthsStandardConfirmation from Lead SSP
Pre-diagnostic assessment  
17The centre should check that using personal mobile phones for calling participants is in line with Trust policy and if it is not, ensure that work mobile phones are available for all SSP clinics. 203 monthsStandardConfirmation from Programme Manager
18The centre should develop a SOP for insourcing screening lists including the process for patient selection.206 monthsStandardCopy of SOP
19Patient information leaflets to be reviewed as per review due dates.4, 206 monthsStandardLeaflet review list
20The centre to provide post investigation calls to all patients as per national guidelines.2012 monthsStandardConfirmation of change of practice e.g., revised SOP
21The centre should carry out an audit to determine how many patients return to the service to complete their pathway after a GP review.96 monthsStandardCopy of the audit
22The centre to carry out CTC investigation dataset accuracy checks ensuring all fields on BCSS system have been completed and all required information is entered accurately.3, 412 monthsStandardData accuracy check results from Lead SSP
23Histology alerts should be checked more regularly than twice a week to ensure that patients are being notified of their results at the earliest opportunity. 33 monthsStandardConfirmation from Lead SSP
Diagnosis
24Obtain JAG accreditation at CHH and HRI.3, 2012 monthsHighJAG certificate
25Support all colonoscopists to achieve the minimum 120 scopes/year by producing an improvement plan for individuals who are not on track3, 206 monthsStandardAll scopists to reach the 120 standard or an improvement plan where this is not the case
26Screening Centre to update BCSP radiologists and radiographers on OBIEE database.26 monthsStandardConfirmation from Programme Manager
27Both the Lead Pathologist and Lead Radiologist from the associated Trusts should be invited to and attend relevant BCSP meetings and receive the minutes.153 monthsStandardConfirmation from Programme Manager
28Start using template-based reporting for BCSP CTCs at NLAG.23 monthsStandardConfirmation from the Lead Radiologist and Lead SSP
29Ensure all CTC reports contain the minimum dataset information needed for entry into BCSS.2, 3,6 monthsStandardAudit of dataset with outcomes and actions by Lead Radiologist
30Both HRI and Pathlinks to investigate the practise of double reporting of malignant polyps in the department and carry out an audit.76 monthsStandardCopy of audit from Lead Pathologists

Next steps

The screening service is responsible for developing an action plan in collaboration with the commissioners to complete the recommendations contained within this report.

SQAS will work with commissioners to monitor activity and progress of the recommendations for 12 months after the report is published. After this point SQAS will send a letter to the provider and commissioners summarising progress made and will outline any further action(s) needed.

Appendix A: References

  1. Bowel cancer screening accreditation Bowel cancer screening accreditation
  2. Bowel cancer screening programme: guidelines for CTC imaging Bowel cancer screening imaging use
  3. Bowel cancer screening programme: standards Bowel cancer screening programme standards
  4. Bowel cancer screening: guidelines for colonoscopy Bowel cancer screening colonoscopy quality assurance
  5. Bowel cancer screening: helping people with learning disabilities Bowel cancer screening helping people with learning disabilities
  6. Bowel cancer screening: managing incidents Bowel cancer screening managing incidents
  7. Bowel cancer screening: pathology guidance on reporting lesions Bowel cancer screening reporting lesions
  8. Bowel cancer screening: programme overview Bowel cancer screening programme overview
  9. Bowel cancer screening: programme specific operating model Bowel cancer screening programme specific operating model
  10. Bowel cancer screening: specialist screening practitioner Bowel cancer screening specialist screening practitioner
  11. Cancer screening: informed consent Cancer screening informed consent
  12. Joint advisory group on GI Endoscopy The JAG
  13. Key Performance Indicators NHS screening programmes Antenatal, newborn, young person and adult NHS population screening: reporting data definitions
  14. Managing Safety Incidents in NHS Screening Programmes Managing safety incidents in NHS screening programmes   
  15. NHS BCSP Quality Assurance arrangements for the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme, Draft version 2.1 (December 2010)
  16. NHS England Serious Incident Framework – Supporting learning to prevent recurrence (March 2015) Serious incident framework
  17. NHS population screening: pathway requirements specifications Bowel cancer screening pathway requirements specifications
  18. PHE Screening inequalities strategy PHE Screening inequalities strategy
  19. https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/Public health profiles Public health profiles
  20. Section 7a screening service schedules no 26 BCSP Schedules 2022-23 – NHS Public Health Commissioning & Operations – Future NHS Collaboration Platform