Scope of this report
Service* | Provider | Commissioner | Within the scope of this visit |
---|---|---|---|
Sickle cell and thalassaemia screening laboratory services |
Full blood count and HPLC: Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
NHS England (South East) |
No – interfaces only |
Infectious diseases screening laboratory services |
HIV, hepatitis B and syphilis: Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
NHS England (South East) |
No – interfaces only |
Fetal anomaly screening – combined screening services |
Dating/NT scan: Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Screening laboratory: Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
NHS England (South East) |
Sonography element- yes |
Fetal anomaly screening – quadruple screening laboratory services |
Dating scan: Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Screening laboratory: Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
NHS England (South East) |
Sonography element- yes |
Fetal anomaly screening – NIPT screening laboratory services |
Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust |
NHS England |
No |
Fetal anomaly screening – 20-week screening scans |
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
NHS England (South East) |
Yes |
Diabetic eye screening
|
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
NHS England (South East) |
Yes |
Newborn and infant physical examination |
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
NHS England (South East) |
Yes |
Newborn blood spot screening laboratory services |
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
NHS England (South East) |
No – interfaces only |
Newborn hearing screening programme |
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
NHS England (South East) |
Yes |
Child Health Information Service (CHIS) |
South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit |
NHS England (South East) |
No |
Screening laboratories are quality assured by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS).
Summary
Quality assurance looks at the antenatal and newborn screening pathways starting with identifying the eligible population of pregnant women and babies. It also includes the relevant screening tests for each programme. For women and babies with screen positive/higher chance results it will also include the pathways for referral, diagnosis and/or treatment.
The findings in this report relate to the quality assurance visit on 23 April 2024 to Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Screening Service which is commissioned by NHS England (South East) Hampshire and Thames Valley Public Health Commissioning team. Any commissioning findings are outside the scope of this report and will be followed up directly with the commissioner.
We use the term ‘woman’ or ‘mother’ to encompass all gender identities and is intended for anyone who is pregnant. Similarly, where the term ‘parents’ is used, this encompasses anyone who has main responsibility for caring for the baby.
Quality assurance purpose and approach
Quality assurance (QA) aims to achieve and maintain national standards, promote continuous improvement in antenatal and newborn (ANNB) screening and support reducing health inequalities. This is to ensure all eligible people have access to a consistent high quality, effective, equitable and safe service wherever they live.
QA visits are carried out by the NHS England Screening Quality Assurance Service (SQAS).
The evidence for this report comes from the following sources:
- monitoring of routine data collected by NHS England
- data and reports from external organisations
- evidence submitted by the provider
- discussion with the commissioner in advance of the visit
- information shared with SQAS as part of the visit process
The screening service
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (OUH) provides services for women across Oxfordshire and bordering areas. Both consultant and midwifery led services are provided at John Radcliffe Hospital with 4 additional standalone midwifery led units across the county. The service reports that it has approximately 7500 deliveries per year.
The scope of this review includes screening delivered by the maternity and sonography services based at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
Delivery of the screening service involves interdependencies with other providers for parts of the pathway. The laboratory services were outside of the scope of this review, however the interfaces relating to the delivery of screening programmes were examined.
The trust has a tertiary fetal medicine referral centre and a Level 3 neonatal intensive care unit on site at the John Radcliffe Hospital.
Findings
This is the second quality assurance visit to OUH. During the visit there was evidence of a commitment to providing high quality services for women and newborn babies through the screening pathways. The local service was aware of some areas for further development and are already planning some enhancements.
Immediate concerns
The QA visit team identified no immediate concerns.
Urgent recommendations
The QA visit team identified 5 urgent recommendations. A letter was sent to the programme manager on 24 April 2024 asking that the following items were addressed:
- implement a process to identify and manage screening safety incidents in line with national guidance ‘Managing safety incidents in NHS screening programmes’
- clarify the process for identification and escalation of risk and issues in antenatal and newborn screening within the trust
- document the process for identification and tracking of the cohort through the screening programmes
- review the mandatory screening training pathway for staff including a process to document compliance against training needs
- make sure that community midwives have appropriate training for the delivery of the screen positive pathway for sickle cell and thalassaemia
An action plan was received within 14 working days which assured the visiting QA team the identified concerns were mitigated.
High priority findings
The QA visit team identified 11 high priority findings as summarised in themes below:
There is a requirement for clinical leadership and greater oversight of the antenatal and newborn screening services within the trust.
Elements of the antenatal and newborn screening pathways do not comply with national specifications:
- there is no process to inform or follow up women who miscarry or terminate their pregnancy after screening
- there is no documented process to inform key stakeholders when a baby dies
- there is no process to identify and refer babies with suspected or confirmed meningitis to audiology
Documentation and updates of key processes and guidance would allow the service greater resilience within the screening teams for example:
- use of generic emails for communication
- implementation of standard operating procedures to describe processes for managing women and babies through the screening pathways
Examples of practice that can be shared
The QA visit team identified several areas of practice for sharing, including:
- Provision of SIM cards and mobiles phones to enable digitally excluded women to access key information during their pregnancy
- Training pathway for midwives completing newborn physical examinations
- The trust meets the achievable level for women completing screening for sickle cell and thalassaemia by 10 weeks gestation
Recommendations
No. |
Recommendation |
Pathway theme |
Reference |
Timescale |
Priority |
Evidence required |
Urgent recommendations | ||||||
01 |
Implement a process to identify and manage screening safety incidents in line with national guidance ‘Managing safety incidents in NHS screening programmes’
|
Governance and leadership |
2 and 5 |
14 days |
Urgent |
Action plan |
02 |
Clarify the process for identification and escalation of risk and issues in antenatal and newborn screening within the trust |
Governance and leadership |
5 and 9 |
14 days |
Urgent |
Action plan |
03 |
Document the process for identification and tracking of the cohort through the screening programmes |
Identification of cohort antenatal and newborn |
9 |
14 days |
Urgent |
Action plan |
04 |
Review the mandatory screening training pathway for staff including a process to document compliance against training needs |
Infrastructure |
9 |
14 days |
Urgent |
Action plan |
05 |
Make sure that community midwives have appropriate training for the delivery of the screen positive pathway for sickle cell and thalassaemia |
Infrastructure |
9 |
14 days |
Urgent |
Action plan |
No. |
Recommendation |
Reference |
Timescale |
Priority |
Evidence required |
High and standard recommendations | |||||
Governance and leadership | |||||
06 |
Make sure there is a trust director or senior nominated person who is responsible for the antenatal and newborn screening services |
9 |
3 months |
Standard |
Organisational structure chart (that is signed off) |
07 |
Make sure there is clinical oversight of the antenatal, newborn blood spot and newborn/infant physical examination screening programmes by a clinical lead |
9 |
3 months |
High |
Organisational structure chart (that is signed off) |
08 |
Update the terms of reference for the ANNB Screening management group to include membership, nominated clinical leads for each screening programme, frequency of meetings, accountability, review of risks and escalation of issues
|
9 |
3 months |
High |
Updated terms of reference |
09 |
Implement an auditable process for the oversight and performance management of Key Performance Indicators and standards data within the trust |
1,4 and 9 |
6 months |
Standard |
Process for data review (that is signed off) |
10 |
Implement a process to review the antenatal screening pathway where a baby has an unexpected sickle cell or thalassaemia condition detected on newborn blood spot screening or where a baby is born unexpectedly with one of the FASP conditions |
9 |
6 months |
Standard |
Documented review/minutes of review meeting – using the SQAS clinical review checklist for antenatal and newborn screening Incident reported (if relevant) Shared learning |
11 |
Collect and analyse inequalities data such as demographic data to understand characteristics of the local population |
6 and 7 |
12 months |
Standard |
Work shared at ANNB Screening management group and programme board and next steps agreed |
12 |
Change and update for all programmes guidelines to comply with national policy and local pathways |
9 |
12 months |
Standard |
Guidelines (that are signed off) |
13 |
Develop a suite of standard operating procedures to describe processes for managing women and babies through the screening pathways |
9 |
12 months |
High |
Standard operating procedures (that are signed off) |
14 |
Implement a process to plan an annual audit schedule for ANNB screening, listed within the organisational schedule with timescales and actions on audit findings reported to the ANNB screening management group |
9 |
12 months |
Standard |
Annual audit schedule Completed audits Confirmation of completed actions in minutes of trust steering group |
15 |
Demonstrate that feedback (including complaints) from service users, including those with protected characteristics or from underserved groups is used to develop and/or improve service delivery for antenatal and newborn screening |
9 |
12 months |
Standard |
User feedback findings action plan discussed at the ANNB screening management group |
Infrastructure | |||||
16 |
Undertake a capacity review for the antenatal and newborn screening service to make sure there is resilience in the service to maintain delivery of screening functions when key members of staff are absent |
9 |
12 months |
Standard |
Business continuity plan (that is signed off) Structure chart or guideline that outlines the functions of the respective role(s) if relevant |
17 |
Implement and monitor a process to make sure NHSP screeners have competency assessed every year and receive individualised feedback |
9 |
12 months |
High |
Competency assessments (with dates) |
18 |
Implement a process for allocating NHS numbers for babies in cases where the maternity IT system fails |
9 |
6 months |
Standard |
Guideline (that is signed off) Business continuity plan (that is signed off) |
19 |
Implement and monitor a process for newborn hearing screening equipment calibration and maintenance or repair as per manufacturers recommendation |
9 |
6 months |
High |
Maintenance contract/log Calibration log Confirmation that equipment is replaced |
20 |
Document the process to make sure that specified consumables for the relevant newborn hearing screening equipment are available to enable continuous delivery of the screening programme |
9 |
12 months |
Standard |
Documented process (that is signed off) |
Identification of cohort (antenatal) | |||||
21 |
Make sure there is a process in place to follow up women who do not attend screening pathway appointments |
9 |
6 months |
Standard |
Guideline (that is signed off) Tracking process Audit (if available) |
Identification of cohort (newborn) | |||||
22 |
Document a process for notifying stakeholders about deceased babies, that includes updating the baby’s status as deceased on the national screening IT systems |
9 |
6 months |
High |
Guideline (that is signed off)
|
23 |
Make sure there is a process in place to follow up babies who are not brought for screening pathway appointments |
9 |
6 months |
Standard |
Guideline (that is signed off) Tracking process Audit (if available) |
Invitation and access | |||||
24 |
Make sure that all communication pathways are via generic inboxes and not to individuals |
9 |
3 months |
High |
Standard operating procedure |
25 |
Implement and monitor a process (that meets the accessible information standard) to make sure women and families receive antenatal and newborn screening information in a format that meets their individual needs |
6 and 9 |
12 months |
High |
Guideline (that is signed off) which should include how the provider identifies women who need: A physical (hard) copy, translated versions, easy read guides, screening animation and digital versions of STFYAYB Interpreting services when English is not the first language Plus, a plan to audit the process within 12 months |
26 |
Make sure all women who miscarry or terminate their pregnancy after screening receive their screening results and are followed up as required |
9 |
6 months |
High |
Guideline (that is signed off) Tracking system Letter templates |
Infectious diseases in pregnancy screening | |||||
27 |
Make sure each woman who declines the initial offer of IDPS screening (HIV, hepatitis B and/or syphilis) is identified, tracked and re-offered screening by 20 weeks of pregnancy or within 2 weeks if greater than or equal to 24 weeks gestation |
9 |
3 months |
High |
Guideline or standard operating procedure |
28 |
Document the process for submission of data to the Integrated Screening Outcomes Surveillance Service (ISOSS) |
9 |
12 months |
Standard |
Guideline (that is signed off) ISOSS provider synopsis report (can be requested from ISOSS team) |
Fetal anomaly screening | |||||
29 |
Implement and monitor a plan to meet the acceptable threshold for standard FASP-S06/FA4 – the proportion of inadequate samples received in the laboratory in the reporting period for Down’s syndrome, Edwards’ syndrome and Patau’s syndrome screening |
1 and 4 |
12 months |
Standard |
Submission of data for standard /key performance indicator FASP-S06/FA4 Action plan that is agreed and monitored by the screening group and programme board |
30 |
Document the process for how women who are pregnant with twins are provided with comprehensive counselling to support decisions in screening for Downs’s syndrome, Edwards’ syndrome and Patau’s |
9 |
6 months |
Standard |
Documented process (that is signed off) |
31 |
Document the process for submission of data to the National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service (NCARDRS) |
9 |
12 months |
Standard |
Documented process (that is signed off) |
Diabetic eye screening in pregnancy | |||||
32 |
Implement and monitor a process to identify and track eligible women – pregnant women with existing type 1 and type 2 diabetes |
8 |
6 months |
Standard |
Guideline (that is signed off) Tracking process |
Newborn hearing screening | |||||
33 |
Make sure that current clinical practice complies with national policy for identification and referral for babies with suspected or confirmed meningitis |
9 |
3 months |
High |
Guideline (that is signed off) |
Newborn blood spot screening | |||||
34 |
Implement and monitor a plan to meet the acceptable threshold for standard NBS-S04 – the proportion of first blood spot samples taken on day 5 |
1 and 4 |
12 months |
Standard |
Submission of data for standard NBS-S04 Action plan that is agreed and monitored by the ANNB screening management group |
35 |
Implement and monitor a plan to meet the acceptable threshold for standard NBS-S03 – the proportion of blood spot cards received by the laboratory with the baby’s NHS number on a barcoded label |
1 and 4 |
12 months |
Standard |
Submission of data for standard NBS-S03 Action plan that is agreed and monitored by the ANNB screening management group |
36 |
Implement and monitor a plan to meet the achievable threshold for standard /key performance indicator NBS-S06/NB2 – the proportion of first blood spot samples that require repeating due to an avoidable failure in the sampling process |
1 and 4 |
12 months |
Standard |
Submission of data for standard /key performance indicator NBS-S06/NB2 NB2 check list and action plan that is agreed and monitored by the ANNB screening management group |
Next steps
The screening service is responsible for developing an action plan in collaboration with the commissioners to complete the recommendations contained within this report.
SQAS will work with commissioners to monitor activity and progress of the recommendations for 12 months after the report is published. After this point SQAS will send a letter to the provider and commissioners summarising progress made and will outline any further action(s) needed.
Appendix G: References
- Key Performance Indicators NHS screening programmes Antenatal, newborn, young person and adult NHS population screening: reporting data definitions
- Managing Safety Incidents in NHS Screening Programmes Managing safety incidents in NHS screening programmes
- NHS England Serious Incident Framework – Supporting learning to prevent recurrence (March 2015) Serious-incident-framework
- NHS population screening standards NHS population screening standards
- NHS population screening: pathway requirements specifications and learning from screening incidents Population screening: pathway requirements specifications
- PHE Screening inequalities strategy PHE Screening inequalities strategy
- Public Health Profiles Public health profiles
- Section 7a screening service schedule 2. DESP Schedule 2 2022-23 – NHS Public Health Commissioning & Operations – FutureNHS Collaboration Platform
- Section 7a screening service schedules 2. ANNB – NHS Public Health Commissioning & Operations – FutureNHS Collaboration Platform
There is more detailed information on individual screening programmes, including handbooks and operational guidance, that can be access via Population screening programmes: detailed information