News

NHS England takes action to improve access to specialised mental health services for children and young people

NHS England is taking urgent action to improve access to specialised inpatient mental health services for children and young people after publishing a “frank and honest” report on current provision.

For England as a whole, the report says “it is impossible to conclude definitively whether the current level of bed provision is sufficient to meet the need.”

The report found that the number of NHS-funded child and adolescent mental health services (CAHMS) tier four beds increased from 844 in 1999 to 1128 in 2006, rising further to 1264 in January 2014.

But NHS England also found relative shortages in the South West and areas such as Yorkshire and Humber, resulting in patients being admitted to services a long way from home.

Alongside undersupply of beds in some areas, there was also evidence of patients being inappropriately admitted to specialised units. This was caused by a variety of reasons including gaps in CAMHS tier three services and other local health and social services provision, as well as weaknesses in commissioning and case management; Tier 4 is reliant upon the arrangements for Tiers 1, 2 and 3 which are organised at a local level.

For example, intensive outreach teams can almost halve the average length of inpatient stay, yet many areas lack them.

In response to the findings, NHS England will urgently:

  • Increase general CAMHS specialised beds for young patients – there will be up to 50 new beds around the country with further beds moved according to need;
  • Recruit 10 to 20 new case managers working  across the country responsible for ensuring that young people receive appropriate levels of care;
  • Improve the way people move in and out of specialised care; with consistent criteria for admission and discharge, based on best practice

In addition, a longer-term, strategic review of CAMHS services, will be carried out as part of NHS England’s wider work on specialised services; this will include further work with patients and their families and in partnership with other organisations.

NHS England took on commissioning responsibility for tier four CAMHS services in April 2013.  Previously they were commissioned by separate commissioning organisations.

In response to concerns about people travelling long distances for care and to bring transparency to these services, NHS England carried out a mapping exercise.

NHS England’s report describes the outcome of the exercise - the first time these specialised services have been looked at nationally by one commissioner.

Dr Martin McShane, NHS England’s director for people with long term conditions, said: “Too many children and young people have had to travel some distance from their homes to access specialised inpatient beds.

“We are committed to both addressing the more immediate problems, by increasing capacity, and to improving these services longer-term, together with our national partners. We want to ensure that we can provide sustainable, high quality care as near to patients’ homes as possible.”

CAMHS Tier 4 are specialised services that provide assessment and treatment for children and young people with emotional, behavioural or mental health difficulties.

There are four tiers of care.  Tiers one to three are community or outpatient-based and commissioned by clinical commissioning groups and local authorities. Tier four services treat patients with more complex needs usually requiring inpatient treatment.

Information collated during the mapping exercise will now be used to inform the longer-term review.

Categories: HomeNews

Tags:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

4 comments

  1. mike still says:

    The raw figures disgusie the fact of the amount of private provission use. The increase in NHS funded beds in 2000 to 2010 was primarily due to a desire to cut ECR referrals.
    The danger of focussing on the teir 4 clients is we take our eyes off the preventive work.
    we are now seeing the effect of goverment cuts to service from 2008 to current at tier 1, 2and 3. in addtion Goverment policy on education and changes focussing away from whole life education, to accademic achievement, with the accadamy programme have also a massive knock on effect.
    We need National guidance, enforced, for the provision of teir 1 2 and 3 services, to address the real issue which is not the provission and management of young people at teir 4 but how did services fail to such an extent that they became teir 4 in the first place.

  2. Peter Morris says:

    When reviewing services, it would in my opinion, be helpful to identify care pathways between Tier 3 and 4 making clear what work and what level of risk is appropriate. Ideally the refering and receiving teams should be familiar to each other and used to their ways of working. As family therapy will be part of most packages of care in Tier 4 arrangements for this should be shared between Tier 3, 4 and the families including frequency of visits and travel arrangements.

  3. dr mike blows says:

    When undertaking the review of CAMHS it may be helpful to look at the effects of reorganisation of services in Suffolk as an example.
    The model follows a discussion paper from Gloucestershire (which wasn’t implemented by Glos.). The majority of the fears by clinicians that the new arrangement would lead to reducing the efficiency of the tier three service, and resulted in an increase (doubling) of admissions to adolescent beds has been realised after 1 year. There are likely systemic management issues- such as no CAMHS trained person in a strategic management position within the trust, but there are predictable issues, such as those cited in the tier 4 review that have likely decreased the efficiency of the service.
    The abandonment of the tiered model (HAS) with loss of specialist services, the dislocation of the MDT including breaking Youth (14-25 years) from Child (under 14′s) has contributed, as has getting rid of the intensive outreach team for under 18′s.

  4. Philippa Boulter says:

    I have worked in CAMHS for 18 years and I am concerned at the number of children and young people (CYP) who are being admitted to Tier 4 services. I do not see any increase in actual mental health problems than there was at the time I started in CAMHS. What I do see is an inability of clinicians across the range of professions to manage, contain and understand the meaning behind children and young people’s increased cry of suicide, increasingly risk adverse cultures in CAMHS, schools, school nursing and peadiatrics and less and less containment and support for CAMHS staff when trying to manage children who are not suicidal but who are saying they are. This week I visited a school about a child who I did not feel was suicidal and was treated with complete distain when I said this and advised them to remove her from ‘suicide’ watch. Their words not mine. The way they are responding to this child makes my job in making sense of why she acting in the way she is increasingly impossible. I have seen CAMHS move from a place where children’s behaviour is thought about and understood, thus making sense of why they are making threats to one of risk assessment and diagnosis, inexperienced staff, lower grades etc. This clearly may reduce costs in one part of the system, Tiers 2 and 3 but escalates them in Tier4 which is serving only a small handful of the child population. It also means there is less expertise available further down the Tiers which means increasing numbers of children are not able to access to a good service. I have watched the CAMHS service in which I work haemorrhage experienced staff replacing them with people who panic, make split second decisions, have little experience and ability with working therapeutically to create change and therefore are unable to tolerate risk. In my view it is very shortsighted.
    Philippa Boulter
    Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychotherapist