Quarter 3 2025/26 (October, November, December 2025)

Patient Safety Event Data Quarterly Publication

1 Background

We publish quarterly official statistics in development on events recorded to the Learn from patient safety events (LFPSE) service. This quarterly publication is based on patient safety event records submitted between October 2025 and December 2025.

The LFPSE service defines a patient safety incident as: ‘something unexpected or unintended has happened, or failed to happen, that could have or did lead to patient harm for one or more person(s) receiving healthcare’. Full details of the definitions and harm gradings are available here.

LFPSE also captures three other patient safety event types: outcomes of concern, risks to patient safety, and instances of good care. Throughout this report, with the exception of table 1, we will be using patient safety incidents only, which constitute the vast majority of patient safety events data recorded to LFPSE. Future versions of this publication will encompass other event types.

2 Data quality information

2.1 Interpreting the data

National data collected by LFPSE comes mainly as a secondary use from what is recorded by staff into local risk management systems (LRMSs). Currently NHS acute providers submit most records we receive. However, anyone can record a patient safety event on the service: they may be healthcare staff from any NHS or private provider, patients or members of the public. LFPSE data is submitted voluntarily to foster openness and encourage continual increases in recording. This means LFPSE data does not, and cannot, provide the definitive number of patient safety events occurring in the NHS; it measures the number of safety events recorded. The number of recorded safety events has increased year on year, which likely reflects improved recording culture and cannot necessarily be interpreted as the NHS becoming less safe. A ‘low’ recording rate for an organisation should not necessarily be interpreted as a ‘safe’ environment; it may represent under-recording. Conversely a ‘high’ recording rate should not be interpreted as ‘unsafe’; it may represent a more open culture. The data presented in this publication was extracted on 05 Mar 2026 and serves as a quarterly snapshot of records currently held in LFPSE. Any figures reported are subject to change as records get updated into the system.

2.2 Missing values

Missing values have been handled and removed from the tables and plots, so the total counts will vary across tables.

2.3 Cleansing

Records that have been submitted with patient identifiable information and are yet to be anonymised will not appear in these data. Records that have been submitted and subsequently updated that contain patient identifiable information, and are yet to be re-anonymised, will be displayed as their previous version in the data until re-anonymised.

3 Event types

LFPSE brings the feature to record patient safety event types beyond incidents. Recorders can now also upload patient safety risks, outcomes, and instances of good care. This is to ensure the database contains more instances of care that the healthcare system can learn from instead of only detailing errors involving patients. In the current period, 855,535 events were recorded to LFPSE, the majority of which were recorded as patient safety incidents (97.01%).

Table 1: Count of the event types in LFPSE

Based on patient safety event records submitted between October 2025 and December 2025.

Event type Number of events Percentage
Incident 829,985 97.01%
Good care 11,888 1.39%
Risk 8,746 1.02%
Outcome 4,916 0.57%
Total 855,535

4 Recording patterns by physical harm

4.1 Psychological harm

LFPSE has a new variable for grading of the psychological harm associated with the recorded patient safety incidents. This is an experimental field which seeks to explore if responses to safety incidents need to be different if psychological harm is considered separately from physical harm, rather than rolling them together into one measure, as was done in the National Reporting Learning Service (NRLS). Currently, there is low confidence in the grading of psychological harm, as users familiarise themselves with its use, and as such, it is excluded from this report.

4.2 Physical harm

Grading the degree of harm to a patient resulting from a patient safety incident can be a challenge for recorders, but by grading patient safety incidents according to the harm they cause patients, local organisations can ensure consistency and comparability of data. This consistent approach locally will enable LFPSE to compare, analyse and learn from data nationally. This grading can also be used to “triage” incidents for review both locally and nationally, ensuring the most serious events are looked at first.

4.3 Harm policy

For more information on harm grading please see the harm grading policy guidelines.

Sometimes a problem in care can affect more than one patient, or none at all. To capture this, as a new feature of LFPSE, recorders can submit information for multiple patients per incident, meaning there can be multiple degrees of harm per incident. For the following figure and table we have taken the highest harm level per incident. We identified and removed 66,080 incidents where the number of patients affected was unknown. Preliminary analysis suggests that these records likely represent incidents with no patients involved. We will continue further data quality checks to validate these figures. During this quarter, 763,905 incidents had recorded a degree of harm. The majority of these incidents (94.07%) recorded low or no physical harm to patients.

Figure 1: Count of patient safety incidents by maximum physical harm

Based on patient safety incidents records submitted between October 2025 and December 2025.

Table 2: Count of patient safety incidents by maximum physical harm

Based on patient safety incidents records submitted between October 2025 and December 2025.

Maximum level of physical harm Count of recorded incidents Percentage
No harm 490,351 64.19%
Low harm 228,269 29.88%
Moderate harm 37,566 4.92%
Severe harm 3,866 0.51%
Fatal 3,853 0.5%
Total 763,905
Note: 66,080 incidents were excluded as they are presumed not to have involved any patients

5 Recording by service area

The LFPSE taxonomy (set of questions and answers) is periodically updated based on the insight/value they provide as well as data capture and user experience. This means there will be some variability between the data captured under different versions. In the plot below, we have grouped some granular categories into broader service groups to account for differences in the recording of service areas between version 5 (used by the majority of the LRMS users) and version 6 (used in the online forms).

  • ‘Maternity inpatient services’, ‘Maternity community services’ and ‘Maternity services (inpatient or community)’, have been coalesced to ‘Maternity Services (inpatient or community)’
  • ‘Mental health community services’, ‘Mental health services (inpatient or community)’ and ‘Mental health inpatient services’, have been coalesced to ‘Mental Health Services (inpatient or community)’
  • ‘GP including out-of-hours services and minor injury units’, ‘GP including out-of-hours services’ and ‘Minor injury unit (MIU) / Urgent treatment centre’, have been coalesced to ‘GP including out-of-hours services and minor injury units’
  • ‘999 emergency ambulance’, ‘Ambulance and 999’, have been coalesced to ‘999 emergency ambulance’
  • ‘LD and Autism services’, ‘Learning Disabilities and Autism services’, have been coalesced to ‘Learning Disabilities and Autism services’

The service area variable can contain multiple responses if the incident occurred in more than one area. As a result, some incidents will be counted more than once, so the figures here cannot be totalled without double-counting records. 826,618 incidents recorded a service area this quarter. The majority of these (57.3%) were recorded under acute, general or specialist services. The remaining were spread primarily across mental health, community, and maternity services. A further 3367 records did not contain a value for service area and are subsequently missing.

Figure 2: Count of incident records by service area

Based on patient safety incidents records submitted between October 2025 and December 2025.

The aggregate data displayed below can be downloaded as a CSV file.

6 Recording by involved agents

The purpose of this variable is to help categorise patient safety events at a general level before reporters add more detail. Involved agents is not a field designed to capture granular incident types, as previously done in the NRLS. The categories in this field are a bespoke list of options used to segment records that are most relevant for NHS England’s data sharing partners (e.g., CQC, MHRA). These categories also serve navigational purposes as users will see specialised questions triggered based on the options they record.

Nonetheless, the breakdowns below can provide an insight of common factors involved in patient safety incidents. There were 829,982 incidents in which a response for this field was recorded, the majority being “none of the above”. This large volume of responses is an expected trend based on the design of the LFPSE. Setting these incidents aside, the most common involved agents recorded this quarter were medications, devices, and IT systems or software (figure 3).

Similar to the service area field, users can select multiple responses in the involved agents field. As a result, some incidents will be counted more than once, so the figures here cannot be totalled without double-counting records. We excluded 3 incidents, as they did not have a response recorded for this field.

Figure 3: Count of incident records by involved agents

Based on patient safety incidents records submitted between October 2025 and December 2025.

The aggregate data displayed below can be downloaded as a CSV file.

7 Recording by safety challenges

Similar to involved agents, the safety challenges categories within LFPSE acts as a flag for when records relate to pre-existing large or national programmes of work on common safety issues, in order to help segment data for the relevant teams where necessary. If the event does not relate directly to any of these programmes, users would select “none of the above”. During this quarter, 829,055 incidents recorded a response under safety challenges, the majority being “none of the above”. Barring this category, the most common safety challenges recorded were pressure ulcers, falls, and self harm (figure 4).

Similar to the service area field, users can select multiple responses when recording safety challenges. As a result, some incidents will be counted more than once, so the figures here cannot be totalled without double-counting records. We excluded 930 incidents, as they did not have a response recorded for this field.

Figure 4: Count of incident records by safety challenges

Based on patient safety incidents records submitted between October 2025 and December 2025.

The aggregate data displayed below can be downloaded as a CSV file.

8 Participation rates in LFPSE

NHS England received 829,985 patient safety incidents in LFPSE between October 2025 and December 2025 (table 1). Most of these incidents (92.6%) were recorded by NHS trusts, totalling 768,682 incidents during this quarter. However, other types of healthcare organisations can and do record to LFPSE. We have begun work to describe and investigate trends in incident recording from other organisation types. This work is experimental but aims to analyse incident recording from organisations in areas such as primary care and, eventually, independent sector NHS-funded care.

During the current period, incidents from primary care comprised 5,757 incidents, or 0.7% of all incidents recorded. Primary care incidents were spread across pharmacy (67.6%), general practitioner (GP) practices (27.6%), primary care networks (PCNs, 4.2%), and other primary care providers (0.7%).

Participation in LFPSE from primary care providers was low, relative to NHS trusts. We currently define participation in the form of participation rates (i.e., the percentage of organisations submitting incidents in LFPSE out of the total number of organisations open in England for the respective organisation type). This measure is experimental and may be subject to change in future reports.

Table 3: Participation in LFPSE by NHS trust and primary care providers

Based on patient safety incident records submitted between October 2025 and December 2025.

Organisation type All providers in England No. registered in LFPSE No. of submitters Participation rate No. of incidents recorded
NHS trusts 205 205 205 100.0% 768,682
Pharmacy 10,459 4,368 1,300 12.4% 3,891
GP practices 6,255 3,736 560 9.0% 1,589
Primary care networks 1,300 816 81 6.2% 239
Other primary care 224 7 38

Notes:

  • All providers in England figures are based on NHS England’s Organisation Data Service (ODS) records of open organisations. We have accounted for organisational changes in the NHS trusts category.
  • Other primary care is a category assigned to an organisation by LFPSE and its broad nature requires further validation. We will likely break down this category in the future, after checking organisation codes in this group using ODS. We will provide England-wide figures at that point.

9 Organisation level

This CSV contains the number of patient safety incidents recorded, the median lag for recording these incidents, and recording rates for NHS trusts by region and trust type, as taken from the trust accounts consolidation (TAC) data publications. Different measures of provider activity have been used to standardise recording rates across different sectors. Quarterly bed days data was used for acute, mental health, and specialist trusts; whilst care contacts data was used across community trusts, and ambulance contacts for ambulance trusts. We explain the calculation of recording lag and rates for each Trust type below.

During the current period there were 16,330 incidents where an organisation code was not present and therefore an organisation could not be identified – these incidents are thus not included in these counts. There were also 8,191 incidents where the reporting organisation was different to the organisation that the incident actually occurred in, accounting for 1.07% of the incidents reported during this period.

The organisation-level table can be downloaded as a CSV file.

10 Recording lag

Recording lag for patient safety events is measured as the difference in the number of days between the date the patient safety incident occurred and the date that it was recorded to LFPSE. The median lag is then taken to minimise the effect of any outliers (such as events which only become apparent many years after occurring). In the current period there are 20,733 patient safety incidents without an incident occurring date and therefore a lag could not be calculated for these records.

In the financial year ending March 2022 (the latest period for which data is published), the median lag for recording into the NRLS was 20 days. In LFPSE for the current recording period, the equivalent figure was 0 days. This reduction is due to the live nature of LFPSE, replacing the requirement for providers to manually extract and upload data as was the case for NRLS. The majority of NHS trusts (74.6%) recording to the LFPSE have a recording lag of 0 days. For the remainder of organisations, recording lag ranged from 1 to 18 days.

Figure 5: Median recording lag (in days) versus total number of incidents recorded, per NHS trust

Based on patient safety incident records submitted between October 2025 and December 2025.

11 Acute, mental health, and specialist trust recording rates

The recording rates for these trust types were calculated using the formula:

Bed days data is used as a measure to standardise activity across NHS trusts. Overnight bed occupancy figures were extracted from the KH03 mandatory data collection published by NHS England. The average daily number of occupied beds was multiplied by the number of days in the reporting period to obtain quarterly bed day figures for NHS organisations.

There was variation in recording rates across different types of NHS trusts. Recording rates (per 1,000 bed days) ranged from 13 to 202 incidents in acute trusts. In mental health trusts, the range observed was 26 to 281 incidents, whilst the range was 29 to 214 incidents across specialist trusts.

The trusts below were excluded because they are out of scope for submission of beds data – i.e., they do not generally provide consultant-led in-patient services:

  • Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • Leicestershire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Isle of Wight NHS Trust is both an acute and an ambulance trust but treated as an acute trust for the purposes of this analysis.

Figure 6: Incident recording rate (per 1,000 bed days) versus total bed days in the quarter, per NHS trust

Based on patient safety incident records submitted between October 2025 and December 2025.

12 Community trust recording rates

The recording rates for each NHS trust were calculated using the formula:

Care contact data is used as a measure to standardise activity across community NHS trusts. Care contact figures were extracted from the Community Service Statistics published by NHS England.

A care contact is defined as any clinical, social or public health activity concerned with the prevention, investigation or treatment of illness and the alleviation of suffering of an individual.

Recording rates varied in this sector from 1 to 16 incidents per 1,000 care contacts.

The organisations below were not included as they had incomplete care contacts data for the reporting period:

  • Hertfordshire Community NHS Trust
  • Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

Figure 7: Incident recording rate (per 1,000 care contacts) versus total care contacts in the quarter, per NHS trust

Based on patient safety incident records submitted between October 2025 and December 2025.

13 Ambulance trust recording rates

The recording rates for each NHS trust were calculated using the formula:

Ambulance contact data is used as a measure to standardise activity across ambulance NHS trusts. Ambulance contact figures were extracted from the Ambulance Quality Indicators published by NHS England.

Recording rates varied in this sector from 411 to 2360 incidents per 1,000 ambulance contacts.

Figure 8: Incident recording rate (per 100,000 ambulance contacts) versus total ambulance contacts in the quarter, per NHS trust

Based on patient safety incident records submitted between October 2025 and December 2025.

14 Future publications

Your feedback is welcome on the format, frequency and utility of this document, so that we can provide reports that are of most benefit. Please contact patientsafety.analysis@nhs.net with any suggestions.